Choice 01 · Host
REAPER
A fast, tightly coded host with deep routing, and a community that is concentrated, hard to impress and badly served on channel strips.
- Headroom you keep
- REAPER users run high track counts on modest machines, and a channel strip lands on dozens of tracks at once. That makes CPU cost a design constraint here, not something measured after the fact. Your plug-ins, buffer size and computer still set the real ceiling.
- Routing worth building for
- Project tabs, full automation and up to 128 routable channels per track cover the comparison and routing work that serious mixes demand. Chicken Strip uses that depth directly, for sidechain keys and for phase groups that align a whole drum kit.
- The same house rules
- REAPER is a small, fast install with no dongle and no phone-home, and it asks an honest price. Chicken Strip keeps the same manners: complete, free, no account, and nothing leaves your machine.
Why it matters now: one host makes failures reproducible and support deep. REAPER first is positioning, not a technical limit: the engine underneath is host-agnostic, so where Chicken Strip goes next is a question of demand rather than a rewrite.